Preferred Content on Kadoorie

Some study content on this site is available in two formats. Please select how you'd prefer to view eligible content:

General Public For individuals who are not healthcare or research professionals, including those with a personal interest in our work.
Healthcare Professionals For doctors, nurses, researchers and other professionals working in healthcare or clinical research.

Note: Not all studies have both formats. Your selection will apply only where alternative views are available.

Register Login

WHiTE 4

WHiTE4_Logo.png
Comparing two types of surgical treatments to fix hip fracture in adults

Theme

Hip Fracture

Body Part

Hip

Fractures are a major global health issue, causing significant disability and healthcare costs. Around half of all hip fractures are treated with a metal implant to fix the bone in place while it heals. The implants allow the patient to start walking while their bone is healing. 

A 'sliding hip screw' is the most common implant used to fix a hip fracture in the UK. Most patients get good results after having their hip fixed with a sliding hip screw. But sometimes the implant can fail to hold the bone in the correct position. If the fixation fails, the patient will need a second operation which leads to longer stays in hospital and an increased risk of dying. 

To reduce the risk of the hip fixation failing, surgeons and engineers designed an alternative implant called the X-Bolt Dynamic Plating System. The X-Bolt uses expanding flanges that grip and compress the surrounding bone for stronger fixation. 

The WHiTE Four Trial compared the sliding hip screw with the X-Bolt system to see which implant allowed the patients to recover their quality of life most quickly.